Search


 

North American Union (NAU)


 

Sovereignty - Complete independence and self-government.  

 

Free Enterprise - an economic and political doctrine holding that a capitalist economy can regulate itself in a freely competitive market through the relationship of supply and demand with a minimum of governmental intervention and regulation.    

 

 

   COMMENTARY 


  June 2, 2011il 22, 2008
In The News

ARTICLEWikiLeaks: 'North American Initiative' no 'theory'

A document posted online by WikiLeaks reveals there were strategy discussions regarding the adoption of a "North American Union" – called the North American Initiative in this case – at the ambassadorial level in the United States government.

 

The concept of a North American Union largely has been ridiculed by many in government and media. The Wikipedia entry on North American Union calls it a "theoretical economic union" that has "been the subject of various conspiracy theories."

 
         COMMENTARY 


  August 11, 2008il 22, 2008
In The News  
ARTICLEObama & McCain: Pawns of the Global Elite - Patrick Wood; August Review
 

In 1972, Brzezinski's wrote that "nation-state as a fundamental unit of man's organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force: International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state."

 

The late Senator Barry Goldwater (R-AZ) was one of a very few people who understood what Brzezinski was alluding to, when he issued a clear and precise warning in his 1979 book, With No Apologies:
 

“The Trilateral Commission is international and is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power – political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical.”

 
            RESEARCH 

  June 16, 2008il 22, 2008
In The News  
ARTICLENAFTA-ization to North Americanization 
 
The emerging regionalism in North America reflects that NAFTA has accomplished some of its goals. Nonetheless, there is an ongoing discussion with regard to the expanded agenda of the region and several proposals have been brought to the academic and political debate. In this regard, five main sections are considered to asses the regionalization of North America. The first introduces some analytical elements about the regionalization in North America; the second shows perceptions of public opinion with regard to the regional agenda; the third refers to the effects of NAFTA, while the fourth evaluates the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SSP) Summits. The fifth presents the case of alternative models for the future of NAFTA.
 

The Idea of a North America Region: From NAFTA-ization to North Americanization

NAFTA has set in motion a process of regionalization divided in two main stages: NAFTA-ization and North-Americanization. Both concepts attempt to reflect the changes in North America and are based on the concept of Europeanization, which can be broadly defined as bargains between states leading to ongoing political adjustment within states. In the case of Europe, it can refer to the reciprocal influence of European integration and the domestic politics of its member states, in either top-down or bottom-up terms. In fact, the original concept of NAFTA-ization is operational for the purposes of studying NAFTA and its reverberations in the three economies of the region. Its proponent, Mark Spinwall, defines it as follows: “it is about political change, not about social or economic change (such as growth in migration or trade). The underlying hypothesis is that regional agreements between states set in motion a process of domestic political adjustment, which is likely to vary according to the nature of the agreement.”   
 
            NAU VIDEO 

  June 7, 2008il 22, 2008
In The News  
 
Representative Tom Tancredo, who made illegal immigration his signature issue on the Presidential campaign trail, urges Americans to learn all they can about efforts to create a “North American Union”...  
 
       SENATE REPORT

  May 31, 2008
In The News  
 
"North Americans are ready for a new relationship. Studies over the past 20 years have shown a convergence of values, on personal and family issues as well as on public policy. An October 2003 poll taken in all three countries by Ekos, a Canadian firm, found that a clear majority believes that a North American economic union will be established in the next ten years. The same survey found an overwhelming majority in favor of more integrated North American policies on the environment, transportation, and defense and a more modest majority in favor of common energy and banking policies. And 75 percent of people in the United States and Canada, and two-thirds of Mexicans, support the development of a North American security perimeter. The U.S., Mexican, and Canadian governments remain zealous defenders of an outdated conception of sovereignty even though their citizens are ready for a new approach. Each nation’s leadership has stressed differences rather than common interests. North America needs leaders who can articulate and pursue a broader vision." - Robert Pastor
 
          COMMENTARY

  April 23, 2008
In The News  
ARTICLENorth American Leaders' Summit - Grassfire and Jerome Corsi Audio Interview
 
 US  HOUSE  TESTIMONY

  April 20, 2008
In The News  
ARTICLEMarci Kaptur North American Union Cintra - Rep. Marci Kaptur exposes secret North American Union in Congress  
 
          COMMENTARY

  April 16, 2008
In The News  

New Names, Same Global Goals

“Trans-Texas Corridor” is renamed “Regional Loop”

“North American Union” ( NAU)  is renamed "North American Standards and Regulatory Area" ( NASRA).

"Fourth SPP Annual Summit" is renamed "North American Leaders' Summit."

"Global Warming" is renamed "Climate Change"



North American Union: Conspiracy or Coverup?

April 16, 2008

by Phyllis Schlafly

Ever since Hillary proclaimed the Clintons as the victims of a "vast right-wing conspiracy," conspiracy has been the hot word used to ridicule your opponents. When President Bush wanted to avoid answering questions about whether the Security and Prosperity Partnership is the prelude to a North American Union connected by a three-country superhighway, he accused SPP critics of believing in a conspiracy.
 
By definition, conspiracies are usually secret. There's nothing secret about right-wingers organizing to criticize the Clintons and their goals, and there's nothing secret about plans to morph the United States into a North American Union.
 

The elites, however, must be feeling the heat. Following the Hudson Institute's helpful suggestion to change the name of the Security and Prosperity Partnership, the fourth annual SPP meeting to be held in New Orleans on April 21 will now be called the North American Leaders Summit, and the promoters of the TransTexas Corridor are trying to change its name to "regional loop." To see what the elites are planning, you don't have peek through keyholes or plant a spy under the table. Just read their published reports.

 

The words most frequently used to describe their goals are "economic integration," "labor mobility," "free movement of goods, services and people across open borders," and "harmonization" of regulations.

The Council on Foreign Relations published a major report on May 17, 2005, only two months after the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) was announced by President Bush, Mexico's Vicente Fox, and Canada's Paul Martin in Waco on March 23, 2005. The CFR document explaining SPP's goals and methodology was posted on the U.S. State Department website, thereby confirming its authenticity.
 
The CFR report explains that the three SPP amigos at Waco "committed their governments" to "Building a North American Community" by 2010 with a common "outer security perimeter," "the extension of full labor mobility to Mexico," allowing Mexican trucks "unlimited access," "totalization" of illegal aliens into the U.S. Social Security system, and "a permanent tribunal for North American dispute resolution."
 
The prestigious Center for Strategic & International Studies published a report in 2007 called "North American Future 2025 Project." It advocates "economic integration," the "free flow of people across national borders," and "policies that integrate governments."
 
The CSIS report even calls for "harmonizing legislation" on intellectual property rights with other countries. That's a direct attack on our U.S. patent system, which is the key to U.S. leadership in inventions and innovation.
 
The Hudson Institute published a 35-page White Paper in 2007 called "Negotiating North America: The Security and Prosperity Partnership." It states that SPP is the vehicle "for economic integration" with Mexico and Canada and even "combines an agenda with a political commitment."
 
The Hudson White Paper explains that SPP's "design" is for the executive branch to exercise full "authority" to "enforce and execute" whatever is decided by a 3-nation agreement of "civil service professionals" as though it were "law." That means evading treaty ratification and even congressional legislation and oversight.
 
Don't forget the importance of the Wall Street Journal and its longtime, very influential editorial-page editor, the late Robert Bartley. When Mexico's Vicente Fox called for NAFTA to evolve into something like the European Union, Bartley wrote: "There is one voice north of the Rio Grande that supports his vision. To wit, this newspaper."
 
One of the most influential business writers, Peter F. Drucker, wrote in his book, Post-Capitalist Society , that "The economic integration of the three countries into one region is proceeding so fast that it will make little difference whether the marriage is sanctified legally or not."
 
When Larry King asked Mexico's Vicente Fox about plans for a "Latin America united with one currency," Fox answered in the affirmative. He said that one currency was part of the "vision" of the Free Trade Area of the Americas that Bush agreed to in the Declaration of Quebec City in 2001.
 
So now we know why the Bush Administration won't build a fence to interfere with "labor mobility" across open borders. Now we know why Bush won't pardon Ignatio Ramos and Jose Compean, while winking at the prosecutor's deal to give immunity to a professional drug smuggler.
 
Now we know why Bush thumbed his nose at the overwhelming congressional votes (411-3 in the House and 75-23 in the Senate) to exclude Mexican trucks from U.S. roads. Now we know why Bush has been more persistent in pursuing "totalization" to put illegal aliens into Social Security than to promote his proposal to privatize a small part of Social Security for American citizens.
 

This is no conspiracy. It's all part of the "economic integration" of the North American countries that's been openly talked about for years.


Further Reading:

Quick Topic: North American Union


Read this column online.

 
 
          IN THE NEWS

  July 26, 2007
In The News  
 
KFAQ’s Podcast of the interview with Jerome Corsi this morning 7-26 on the NAU and OKC Mayor Mick Cornett’s comments.


        IN THE NEWS

   July 7, 2007
In The News  

WASHINGTON – A powerful think tank chaired by former Sen. Sam Nunn and guided by trustees including Richard Armitage, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Harold Brown, William Cohen and Henry Kissinger, is in the final stages of preparing a report to the White House and U.S. Congress on the benefits of integrating the U.S., Mexico and Canada into one political, economic and security bloc.


     OK-SAFE LINK


    June 21, 2007
>OK-SAFE LINK  
 
Petition to the Members of the US Congress, by the Conservative Caucus.
 
           IN THE NEWS


  June 6, 2007
In The News  

Are an international super highway and a North American Union on the horizon? A proposed multi-modal transportation system could leave Oklahoma stuck in the middle.

                                       

       OK-SAFE LINK

   June 6, 2007
>OK-SAFE LINK  

The Stop The North American Union website.
 

  OK-SAFE DOCUMENT

   June 6, 2007
>OK-Safe Document  

The North American Union Timeline.
 

  OK-SAFE DOCUMENT

   June 6, 2007
>OK-Safe Document  
Backgrounder: North American Future 2025 Project
 

   OK-SAFE REPORTS

  December 7, 2006
In The News  
Recently, I was able to attend the North America Works II Conference, held in Kansas City, Missouri. The subject was ‘Building North American Competitiveness’ through transportation integration, “to help North America be competitive in the global economy.”
 
Held Nov. 30 – Dec. 2, 2006, and co-sponsored by the City of Kansas City, International Affairs and Trade Office, and the Council of the Americas/North American Business Committee, the conference took place in the downtown Kansas City Marriott. Approximately 130 people attended. - Amanda Teegarden  
 
 
In The News  

Please send technical comments and problems to: webmaster

Fair Use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material, the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for educational purposes, and as such constitutes "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Our Privacy Policy: The only personal information we give to any third party is the information you provide to us when using your debit or credit card to make a donation or purchase. All other information and correspondence are strictly confidential. We never sell, give away or barter mail lists or other information to any person, business, organization or corporation for any reason. We will not provide any personal information about you to any government or agency or employee of any government, foreign or domestic, except when we are under a court order to do so.

Why Support OK-SAFE?

Other Resources

Supporting Documents

The Bill Of Rights:
(Outside Document)

Oklahoma Constitution:
(Outside Document)

The United States Constitution:
(Outside Document)

The Declaration of Independence:
(Outside Document)

The NAFTA Agreement:
(Outside Document)

CAFTA:
(OK-Safe Document)

SAFETEA-LU Public Law 109-59:
(OK-Safe Document)

USDOT Corridors of the Future Program:
(OK-Safe Document)

Participants in USDOT Corridors of the Future Program:
(OK-Safe Document)


State of Oklahoma 

Oklahoma's Official Website

(http://www.ok.gov/)

Oklahoma Governor's Office

(http://www.ok.gov/governor/index.php)

Oklahoma Lieutenant Governor's Office

(http://www.ok.gov/ltgovernor/)

Oklahoma Secretary of State

(http://www.sos.state.ok.us/)

Oklahoma Agency Directory

(http://www.ok.gov/genthree/agency.php?let=all)

Oklahoma Office of State Finance

(http://ok.gov/OSF/index.html)

Oklahoma Open Books

(http://www.ok.gov/okaa/)

OklahomaState Legislature

(http://www.lsb.state.ok.us/)

OklahomaState Courts Network

(http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/start.asp)

OklahomaState Constitution

(http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/index.asp?ftdb=STOKCN&level=1)

OklahomaState Statutes

(http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/index.asp?ftdb=STOKST&level=1)

OklahomaState Election Board

(http://www.ok.gov/~elections/)

Find Your Legislators

(http://www.capitolconnect.com/oklahoma/default.aspx)


Links To Other Organizations 

LibertyForge:
(http://www.libertyforge.us)
Corridor Watch

(http://www.corridorwatch.org/)

Freedom 21

(www.freedom21.org)

American Policy Center:

(http://www.americanpolicy.org/)

Eco-Logic Powerhouse:
(http://www.freedom.org/eco/index.html)

Sovereignty International, Inc.
(
http://sovereignty.net)    

Conservative News:
(http://www.humanevents.com/)

Judicial Watch:
(http://judicialwatch.org/)

The August Review:
(http://www.augustreview.com/)

Trans-Texas Corridor:
(OK-SAFE Document)

WorldNet Daily:
(http://www.worldnetdaily.com/)

Texans for Immigration Reform

(www.tfir.org)

The Conservative Caucus:
(http://www.conservativeusa.org/)

The John Birch Society :
(http://www.jbs.org/)

The Minuteman Civil Defense Corps:
(http://www.minutemanhq.com/)

Coalition for a Prosperous America:
(http://www.prosperousamerica.org)

State Legislators for Legal Immigration:
(http://www.statelegislatorsforlegalimmigration.com)

Owasso Taxpayer Alliance:

(http://www.owassotaxpayer.com/)

Liberty Ark Coalition:

(http://www.libertyark.net/)

Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance:

(http://farmandranchfreedom.org/content/)

NONAIS:

(http://www.nonais.org/)

Arkansas Animal Producers:
(http://arkansasanimalproducers.8k.com/)

The Arizona Sentinel:

(http://thearizonasentinel.wordpress.com/)

Parental Rights:

(http://www.parentalrights.org/)

(http://restoretherepublic.com/)

(http://billkumpelawfirm.sharepoint.com/Pages/default.aspx)

(http://www.tulsansunitedforfairness.org)


Research  
(http://www.crosswalk.com/blogs/epiper/archives.html)

(http://www.bastiatsociety.com/)

Vicky Davis of Channeling Reality:
(http://www.channelingreality.com/)

Joan Veon of WomensGroup.org:
(http://www.womensgroup.org/)

Joan Veon of NewsWithViews.com:
(http://www.newswithviews.com/Veon/joanA.htm)

Charlotte T. Iserbyt of AmericanDeception.com:
(http://www.americandeception.com/index.php?page=home)

Charlotte T. Iserbyt of DeliberateDumbingDown.com:

AxXiom for Liberty

(http://axiomamuse.wordpress.com/)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
Copyright ©2007 Oklahomans for Sovereignty and Free Enterprise, Inc. All Rights Reserved