|
Search
|
|
New Urbanism - Randy Bright
Randy W. Bright, AIA, NCARB, is an architect who specializes in church and church-related projects. You may contact him at 918-664-7957, rwbrightchurcharch@sbcglobal.net or www.churcharchitect.net.
Most of us here in the Tulsa area are aware of the controversial Red Clay Casino that is currently under construction in Broken Arrow, a suburb of Tulsa. The project came as a surprise to Broken Arrow residents who were unaware that the casino was going to be built, igniting a firestorm of protests.
Last week, Catholic Churches across America did something that was unthinkable until the present administration took power in the White House. A letter was read to congregants from the Bishop of Marquette stating a refusal to obey the law.
We see the growing trend toward density in American cities, but nowhere is the density of a megacity more exemplified than in the rapid growth in China.
In an article in the Delhi Guardian, authors Paul Webster and Jason Burke describe a project currently under construction in the southwest China city of Chengdu as a behemoth. The authors wrote, When finished later this year, its developers proudly boast, it will be the world's largest stand-alone building. The New Century Global Centre is a leisure complex that will house two 1,000-room five-star hotels, an ice rink, a luxury Imax cinema, vast shopping malls and a 20,000-capacity indoor swimming pool with 400 meters of coastline and a fake beach the size of 10 football pitches(sic) complete with its own seaside village.
Last Sunday my pastor gave us some disturbing statistics about the growth of churches in America. The study he cited concluded that church growth is very small, only about 2 percent per year on average.
The question is why? Why would the church, which has been a central focus of American life since our founding, suddenly begin losing ground?
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled last week in favor of a church that had fired a ministerial employee, signaling a hopeful change of attitude toward the rights of churches to conduct their own affairs according to their own beliefs.
After hearing that the Share Christmas event at my church had provided Christmas presents to more than 260 children from low-income families, it struck me that so few people know just what an impact churches have on their communities.
It's a popular notion that all churches send missionaries to Africa, but it's just that a popular notion. While some churches do in fact send missionaries to Africa, that is a very small part of the giving that churches do.
This coming year is shaping up to be perhaps one of the most pivotal years in American history. I, like a lot of Americans, have a number of things that I would like to accomplish and to see accomplished in the next twelve months.
There are two extremely important issues religious rights and property rights on which everything that we as Americans depend upon in order to keep our freedoms.
In the beginning the Word already existed. He was with God, and he was God. He was in the beginning with God. He created everything there is. Nothing exists that he didn't make.' (John 1:13 NLT)
The Word is who the apostle Paul spoke about in Romans 1:20 (NLT) when he said:
The Brits have figured it out manmade global warming is a farce and Climategate has been instrumental in revealing the fact that data has been twisted to say something other than the truth.
The recently released British Social Attitudes report surveyed U.K. consumers and found that they are no longer willing to pay the extra money to go green because of their skepticism of man-made climate change. Here are some of the findings of the survey.
It appears that churches are bearing the brunt of a rising tide of hate crimes as the number and severity of vandalism attacks against churches is increasing.
Thefts from churches are common, especially in the last year as copper prices have risen and the economy continues to decline. Audio and video equipment in churches have been the targets of thieves for many years, but in the last few months the crimes against churches have taken a sinister turn.
Since the City of Tulsa has hired the new director of planning and economic development, Dawn Warrick, I think it is a given that there will be a focus on developing Tulsa's new zoning code. In my last two articles I have voiced concern regarding how churches will be treated and regulated.
It was not that long ago that a city official told me that it was considered bad public relations for the city not to go the extra distance to help churches work through the zoning and permitting process. I have no reason to believe that anything has changed in that regard with certain officials, but the new code will be developed, for the most part, by outside consultants and with the new director, and it is not altogether clear how much INCOG will be involved with the effort.
Much emphasis is placed on the concept of community in modern planning. Planners believe that cities can and should be developed so that everyone lives in a kind of microcosm, within a region that is within walking distance of home and work and one that contains third places that give people a sense of belonging and camaraderie.
Since its beginning, churches have always been an important part of communities in America. They have been the traditional gathering place in cities and towns for centuries. They served as the third place long before the term was invented.
History was made in Tulsa on November 7 when Dawn Warrick was named Tulsa's first director of planning and economic development. Warrick comes to us after acting as the assistant director of planning in design in Louisville, Ky., and, prior to that, she was an assistant zoning and development director in Fayetteville, Ark.
Since PlaniTulsa was approved by the City Council last year, there has not been a great deal of activity on the implementation of Tulsa's new comprehensive plan into a new zoning code. One of Warrick's most immediate tasks will be to begin work doing just that.
In all the architectural trade journals I receive, I rarely see architectural designs that I like, but for the most part I appreciate the diverse creativity that comes out of the architectural profession.
This is especially true of architecture that would not have been possible even two decades ago. The advances in CADD (Computer Aided Drafting and Design) has given us the ability to design geometrically complex structures, giving birth to curvilinear shapes and forms never seen before in architecture, and new computer programs have allowed engineers to design the complex structural and mechanical systems needed to make those designs possible.
So it is not often that I take the opportunity to poke fun at architecture, but sometimes architecture needs a good dose of reality.
Nearly three quarters of a century ago, on November 7, 1938, an angry young man walked into the German embassy in Paris intent upon killing the German Ambassador. Not finding him, he instead shot and killed Germany's Third Secretary Ernst vom Rath.
Hershel Grynszpan was seeking revenge on the Germans, who during the prior week had evicted his Jewish parents from the city of Hanover, Germany. All of their possessions, including the store Grynszpan’s father had owned since 1911, had been confiscated by the German police, and the family had been forced into a refugee camp across the border in Poland.
There is a building boom coming - maybe.
Since the moment the public perceived that Obama might become our next president back in 2008, the economy began to slide downhill. It took a steep dive shortly after he took office, and so did the amount of construction.
It wasn’t just his presidency that caused the fall. For years, regulations and smart growth policies have placed a stranglehold on construction, making the conditions necessary for a crash possible. Obama’s presidency, along with the Obamacare bill and his czars and their regulations, was simply the catalyst.
It is the American culture as builders and entrepreneurs coupled with capitalism that makes it difficult for even a diehard Marxist to snuff out our way of life. It is for that reason that I believe there is a great building boom in our near future, and it is the optimism that the American public is sensing with some of the candidates that are running for president that makes me believe it is true that America could still be seeing its finest days ahead. For it to take place, however, there is a lot that needs to happen.
While all of these thoughts have their merit, and I understand that the article was focusing in on one aspect of sustainability, the term mixed-use was not well defined. Mixed use is only one ingredient of the sustainability movement. To add to the confusion, sustainability holds different meanings among different groups. To the environmentalist, it means solving global warming. To preservationists, it means keeping a historical building intact when it needs to be torn down. To a city administrator, it means densification and smart growth, which means more tax revenue. To architects, sustainability has become a structured practice, as demonstrated by the trend toward getting LEED certification for building projects in a holistic way. To planners, it means getting rid of urban sprawl and designing communities around people instead of cars. To the federal government, it means more regulations, and to the United Nations it means regulating everyone on the planet. So who can blame anyone for getting a little confused?
The conclusion that these places of worship, all apparently in presumably agricultural areas, had influenced the demographics of growth was indeed correct. All four examples, including the (Italian) Catholic Church, were examples of strong ethnic associations within the context of a place of worship. Three of the examples were not of mainstream religions found in the United States, and the fourth was apparently unique among Catholic churches. Yet Laidlaw's article will leave the reader believing that all churches must be expected to produce the same effects as Agrawal's examples, perhaps because he attended a conference where the professor spoke about churches and municipal planning.
I can't say I have ever heard of Aloha 1A dirt, but given the amount of protection given to it in the ordinance, it must have been some really good dirt.
When the church sought approval for their new church project, the county planning director issued a directive claiming that churches were not allowed in the Exclusive Farm Zone because it was within three miles of an Urban Growth Boundary.
Urban Growth Boundaries are established to contain development within specified areas. To prevent development on the opposite side of the line, they usually are surrounded by another area in which little or no development is allowed. In a real sense, an Urban Growth Boundary is not a line, but a swath that can be many miles wide.
Several years ago, an article by Stuart Laidlaw appeared on TheStar.com website entitled Churches kickstart suburban sprawl, study shows. The opening paragraph stated, Fast-growing churches, frustrated with the slow pace of municipal planning, often find themselves pushed into setting up shop in rural areas on the edge of town, where they end up contributing to suburban sprawl, a Ryerson University study has found.
As we see the growth in government, we are also seeing a growth in corruption. At this moment, the Solyndra scandal is beginning to get the attention of the FBI and pundits are saying that the corruption may go all the way to the White House. But why should the growth in corruption surprise anyone? Many of our country's leaders no longer respect, fear or even believe in God, at least not the one in the Bible.
The problem between “church and state” just seems to be getting worse, and from all indications it’s not going to get any better any time soon. The recent boondoggle created by Mayor Bloomberg’s decision to prohibit any clergy from participating in the 9/11 ceremonies underscores the lack of understanding of what the “separation of church and state” actually means.
According to an article in the Desert Sun and linked to Aviation eBrief (an online newsletter produced by the AOPA Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association), a two-and-a-half-year-long lawsuit has finally been dropped against several people and companies who allegedly flew their hot-air balloons too low over a farm in California.
JCM Farming, Inc. filed the lawsuit, according to the article, “never once having to show proof to a judge that its initial, central complaint was true: that the balloonists had flown too low over its property and caused a nuisance.”
Tom Scott, the executive director of California Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse, the attorney who defended the balloonists, said that “For $300, I can upend your life, whether there’s merit or no merit to my case.”
Back during our last gubernatorial election, a lobbyist (who happened to be a democrat) told me that no one wanted to support Senator Randy Brogdon because he was “against everything.” Of course, Brogdon was not against everything, he simply looked at regulations from a Constitutional perspective.
However, if that lobbyist had taken an objective look at Brogdon’s position, and could set political prejudices aside, he might have come to a different conclusion. Brogdon believed that government had grown too large and that it used laws and regulations to pick winners and losers, usually at taxpayer expense.
Most people who read my columns might conclude that I am anti-regulation, that I am “against everything” that the government does, because in most cases I see more government regulations as a negative. In fact, I believe that laws and regulations are necessary and can be beneficial to society, just as the Founders did.
One day we were discussing the fact that Russia was buying grain from the United States because they were unable to produce enough for themselves. Knowing that Russia was a very large and fertile country, I thought it odd that they would have to resort to buying grain from an avowed enemy.
Stan said the reason was simple. He said, (I’m paraphrasing) “In the United States, farmers work until the job is done because they get to keep what they earn. In Russia, a farmer starts driving his tractor at eight in the morning, and quits at five in the afternoon. He doesn’t care if the job gets done or not because he won’t earn any more or less if he only works eight hours a day.”
America has been gradually moving away from its Constitution and toward a form of socialism for many years, and while most of us realize that things are not as free as they used to be, we may not realize just how closely our policies come to meeting the definition of Marxism.
Of course, few would admit that we are Marxist because we can still vote, we still have (somewhat) free enterprise, and we can still travel without a soldier asking us for our “papers” at a check point. And we certainly don’t think of ourselves as the Communist that Karl Marx (1818-1883) was.
But before you think I’ve lost my senses, listen to what Karl Marx and his close friend Friedrich Engels believed government policies should be.
Last year, the National League of Cities said that municipal governments were likely to fall short of funding between $56 billion and $83 billion by the end of this year. Just recently, Reuters reported that the city of Central Falls, Rhode Island, (population 19,000) filed for Chapter 9 bankruptcy with an outstanding debt of $21 million.
Cities across the country are facing similar economic problems, albeit not so severe. However, my concern has been for some time that the need for funding has been and will in the future affect how cities will treat the churches within their borders.
I’m not saying that all cities are becoming anti-church, though I have read some accounts that were unquestionably just that. It is beyond question, though, that attitudes toward churches over the last decade or so have taken a turn for the worse, and not just in city government.
The old saying in business is that if you want your business to be successful, study a successful business and do what they do. But sometimes it is just as profitable to look at those who are failing and don’t do what they do.
The Washington Post recently printed the ten most expensive areas in the country, based on median home prices. It should come as no surprise that nearly all of them were in states where land is heavily regulated.
The highest was Honolulu, which I understand has a lot of regulations, with a median home price of $579,300. But come on, it’s an island in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. Of course, it’s going to be an expensive place.
The next thing that needs to be done is to repeal Obamacare completely. Kill it and bury it, and even enact legislation that will prohibit anything like it to pass again. Obamacare is a political and economic nightmare. It alone has the ability to destroy our economy as well as our freedoms. We also must go back to the traditional values of the Constitution and abandon the idea that it is a “living” document. In so doing, we must reverse the flawed Supreme Court decision Kelo vs. New London, so that never again will one individual have his or her property stolen from them and given to another using eminent domain under the guise of economic benefit. In addition, we must oppose Sharia law from being implemented anywhere in the United States.
After reviewing data for the years spanning 2000 to 2007 from a number of sources including the Federal Reserve, Demographia, the Census Bureau and Harvard University, Cox observed a wide difference in home price escalation, concluding that the housing bubble affected some areas disproportionately more than others:
“In the 10 markets with the greatest rise in prices compared to income, the cost of a house rose by an average of $275,000, relative to incomes. Among the second 10 markets with the greatest price escalation, house prices rose $135,000. By contrast, in the major markets with the least rise in prices, houses increased only $5,000.”
Cox observed that the areas that were more greatly affected were areas whose markets were “prescriptively” regulated instead of “responsively” regulated.
A prescriptively regulated market is one that promotes “smart growth” policies designed to prevent urban sprawl and use of the car and that promote those such as urban growth boundaries, growth management, home construction moratoria, excessive development fees, and planning.
A responsively regulated market is one with few restrictions or planning, so that the market can respond to market conditions quickly, undeterred by government red tape.
A few weeks ago, I received a rather urgent e-mail from a gentleman in Maryland who was asking for advice regarding a letter from his municipality stating that his church building could no longer be used as a church.
Back in 2005, I wrote an article about how the government was systematically cleansing certain rural areas through imposition of regulations and judicial orders. In fact, rural areas of America and other countries have been in decline for some time.
Loss of manufacturing to Mexico, China and India has played a large part in the decline. Once a large source of low-cost labor (and few regulations), small towns in rural areas provided the bulk of the manufacturing base, but when the factories pulled up stakes and left for even cheaper labor and fewer regulations overseas, small towns began to suffer severely. Businesses began to close, forcing families to leave in search of jobs. Then more businesses closed, and more people left, until eventually the grocery stores, the banks and even some schools closed. When that happens, a town is essentially finished, leaving mostly elderly populations to deal with aging and crumbling infrastructure.
Construction is incredibly important to local economies and to the aggregate economy of the nation. As an example, according to an article in the Denver Post, out of the 130,000 jobs that the state of Colorado has lost over the past three years, 60,000 of them were construction jobs. Prior to 2007, one out of every five jobs was construction related.
We have a long way to go to rebuild the construction industry to what it was before the crash. Job losses and business closures have been massive and across the board, including mortgage brokers, architects, engineers, contractors and subcontractors. In Colorado alone, 466 homebuilders closed their doors between 2007 and 2009.
During the Ottoman conquest in 1453, Mehmet the Conquerer converted it to a mosque. It was at that time that four large minaret towers were added to the structure, giving its now famous appearance. It continued to serve as a mosque until 1934, when it was converted to a museum.
When Constantinople (Istanbul) was conquered in 1453, a 16th century historian said that “churches which were within the city were emptied of their vile idols and cleansed from the filthy and idolatrous impurities and by the defacement of their images and the erection of Islamic prayer niches and pulpits…many monasteries and chapels became the envy of the gardens of paradise.”
Apparently Curtis has never studied what is happening in Iraq where Christians are being driven out by Muslims, or in Egypt where churches are being burned by Muslims, or in England where over a thousand churches have been converted to mosques and Sharia law is effect in many areas, or in the many places in Europe where police won’t go to “no-go” Islamic enclaves because of the danger, or even at the growth of Islam in Dearborn, Michigan.
In Iraq last October, 52 Christians were massacred by al Qaeda guerillas in response to burnings of the Quran in the United States. Since then, up to 95,000 Christians have fled the country. Around 500,000 had already left due to persecution that has included beheadings, rapes and extortion. It is expected that in just a few years, virtually all of the Christians will have left Iraq.
This is particularly disappointing, since it was a Christian nation that was primarily responsible for freeing the Iraqi people. Obviously, there will be no church construction in Iraq and what few churches that might have been there will likely be converted to mosques, much as has been the fate of many of the churches in Europe.
Newgeography.com recently published an excellent article by Phil McDermott entitled Where Do the Children Play, in which he challenged the current thinking that densely developed cities are good for our health. He contested the conclusions of a study by the New Zealand Public Health Advisory that “cited four principles for healthy urban planning based on the density of development: urban regeneration, compact growth, focused decentralization and linear concentration. The aim is less time in cars and more use of active transport.”
McDermott points out poor health in densely developed environments can be a result of “traffic volumes, strangers on the street and lack of outdoor play space” and that in those environments there are disadvantages that include, “insufficient space, internal noise, lack of natural light, lack of privacy, inadequate parking, inadequate indoor play space and the potentially hazardous nature of balconies.” All of those disadvantages, by the way, are for the most part solved by less densely developed urban areas, the suburbs that are being blamed for unhealthy lifestyles.
Each year, the American Institute of Architects (AIA) holds its annual convention at a different major city each year and this year it was in New Orleans. Over the past several years, the convention has focused on sustainability issues and this year was no different. The keynote speaker was Thomas Friedman, (who is not an architect) who sounded the warning that architects and others must fundamentally change to prevent an environmental calamity.
Friedman said that a green revolution is in the interest of national security, and appealing to the patriotic said, “Green is the new red, white and blue – don’t let anyone tell you otherwise,” and “ultimately, we need to make the word ‘green’ disappear. There should be no such thing as a ‘green’ car – it’s just a car, and you can’t buy it otherwise.”
Having inadvertently become a student of urban planning, each day I go to several websites to read articles and to see what planners think about trends and what demographers have discovered with statistics.
Each website has their own agenda, naturally quite opposite from each other, and it is interesting to see how some of the contributing authors have deep-seated views, while others are only interested in proving their points by ridiculing those who oppose their own. The common theme that runs through all of them is this: if you believe as I believe, and do as I think you should do, the world will be a better place.
I find it amusing when I discover there are people out there that are writing about New Urbanism that know so little about it. Such is the case with New Urban Mom, who took me to task about an article I wrote in January of last year concerning a paper written by an Urban Planner Ruth Durack.
First of all, I don’t know who New Urban Mom is; she apparently does not share her name with her readers, so for brevity I’ll simply call her NUM, with no disrespect intended.
I have long advocated the idea that churches should be doing more for their communities, especially in the area of education. The future of our country depends upon the current generation of children learning not only the right things, but also learning the right moral and work ethic. There is nowhere better for a child to be educated than under a Godly and Christian system.
So I was very happy to learn that there will be a new Christian school opening in August of this year in Skiatook. The school’s founder, Sabrina Miller, an associate with Immanuel Baptist Church, has felt the calling to open the new school, Hope Christian Academy.
Architects are beginning to realize that prescribing energy-saving technologies and techniques is creating unexpected professional liabilities. In the 1980s, architects were convincing clients that incorporating solar energy equipment and design techniques into their buildings would reduce their energy costs. Lawsuits followed when the savings never materialized. Now architects and engineers are being sued as their “green” designs are not performing as expected.
I have just returned from Wauchula, Florida, after my annual trip to see the Story of Jesus Passion Play. This is the fourth year that I have attended, and even after seeing the play a total of eight times, it is just as fresh and enriching as it was the first time I saw it.
America has been gradually moving away from its Constitution and toward a form of socialism for many years, and while most of us realize that things are not as free as they used to be, we may not realize just how closely our policies come to meeting the definition of Marxism.
Of course, few would admit that we are Marxist because we can still vote, we still have (somewhat) free enterprise, and we can still travel without a soldier asking us for our “papers” at a check point. And we certainly don’t think of ourselves as the Communist that Karl Marx (1818-1883) was.
But before you think I’ve lost my senses, listen to what Karl Marx and his close friend Friedrich Engels believed government policies should be.
Israel, from the time of its rebirth in 1948, has been surrounded by enemies who have been intent upon destroying it. But now it is facing far more than it ever has.
Israel is becoming a richer nation and is likely to become much richer due to the relatively recent discoveries of oil and natural gas both in Israel and just off its shores. But Russia desperately needs to sell its gas and oil resources at prices that will allow it to be profitable for them, and it also needs to sell arms from its military industrial complex. When Israel places its oil and gas on the market, prices could dip to a point low enough to decimate the Russian economy. Since one of the goals of Vladimir Putin is to rebuild Russia’s military, it cannot allow Israel’s oil to reach the market.
There is both good news and bad news on the issue of discrimination against churches by cities.
It appears that the number of discrimination cases is escalating and cities are coming up with new and creative ways to prohibit churches from building or to even cause them to close their doors. It is as though there is an unwritten playbook being passed from city to city that shows how to evict a church.
We’ve all seen carpetbaggers in spaghetti westerns selling worthless snake oil products from a covered wagon, who quickly left town before it was discovered that that little bottle of elixir really couldn’t cure the gout with just one dose.
In the 1960s and 70s, and even into the 80s, the carpetbaggers of the time were land speculators who bought large tracts of inexpensive rural land, subdivided it, then sold it off using high pressure sales tactics that usually involved offering a small gift for listening to their sales pitch. It was a time when Americans were becoming more prosperous, and many were looking for a quiet country setting for a second home or to build a retirement home.
We are all watching the news in astonishment at the power and destruction of the 8.9 earthquake that hit Japan on March 11.
This is the second earthquake in less than a century that has brought mass destruction to the Japanese islands.
The first one, the Great Kanto Earthquake, struck during the lunch hour on September 1, 1923, when a 7.9 (or possibly an 8.3) magnitude earthquake struck and shook the area for up to ten minutes. There were 57 recorded aftershocks.
I hope Tulsa’s city planners are taking a hard look at data recently released from the 2010 Census because it paints a much different picture of where growth is occurring than the urban planner crowd has been telling us.
Urban planners have been telling us for years that population growth will necessarily be in urban areas, primarily because of changing demographics and the development of light rail. But the Census is showing that their predictions of urban growth in favor of suburban growth were simply incorrect.
Despite Obama’s proposal to spend $53 billion on high-speed rail, the fact that our nation’s debt just exceeded its GDP and states like Wisconsin are fighting unions and an AWOL Congress, we are seeing glimpses of sanity here and there.
One of those is New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who recently cancelled the $8.7 billion Hudson River tunnel project because it was over budget. His advisors estimated that the cost of constructing the tunnel could have cost over $14 billion. Christie cited Boston’s “Big Dig” that cost nearly ten times its original estimated cost of $2.8 billion as an example of what he wanted to prevent.
We can see another glimpse of sanity in the state of Florida, where newly elected Gov. Rick Scott has recently cancelled a high speed rail line that was to have linked Tampa with Orlando.
Those who watched or participated in the PlaniTulsa comprehensive planning process are aware that there were a number of workshops held to solicit public opinion about what was being planned. It is a process I believe to be flawed, because it is prone to favoring one idea over another and as such, can produce outcomes that were planned in advance.
Apparently Andres Duany agrees, but not for the same reason. He popularized the concept of the charette, or workshop in our case, but now is promoting a new concept that he calls subsidiarity.
In that article, entitled “Control the Masses,” Duany was quoted saying that subsidiarity is “the design of decisions: what issue, by which people, and when… The smallest group at the latest point in time that can competently make a decision …thus we’re evolving participatory planning towards a more intelligent democracy.”
My Google Alerts picked up an interesting, but lengthy, article by Mike Easterling that effectively demonstrates that we are likely to see a big shakeup in how planning is done downtown. At issue is the role that INCOG will play in providing zoning code conformance analysis of proposed projects.
Some speculate that INCOG will be phased out in favor of creation of an in-house staff that would take over INCOG’s duties. I thought that was made clear when the draft of the Comprehensive Plan was published. The text of the document suggested a diminished role for INCOG, not outright dismissal, but my interpretation of the text seemed to indicate that INCOG would become less important or involved in planning issues. Instead, I believe that INCOG will eventually only be used as a source for maps and other records, and even that role will eventually disappear.
Our recent record setting snowstorm is the latest excuse for Al Gore to claim that global warming was a real man-made problem.
But hold on, Al, it just ain’t so.
When I was in college, one of the books we were required to read was “How to Lie with Statistics”. The essence of the book was that you could take truthful statistics and twist them to prove anything you want, even if it was false. I believe that is exactly what has happened with the movement to prevent man-made global warming.
On the heels of a great victory for the Religious Land Use Act (RLUIPA) in the case involving Rocky Mountain Christian Church, it didn’t take long for another church to be denied a permit to build.
This time it is a small congregation, All Souls Church of God in Christ, near Atlanta, Georgia, who wanted to build an 8,400-square-foot building on a 5-acre tract of land. After renting storefront space for the past ten years, the congregation has purchased land and saved sufficient funds to build. Prior to purchasing the land, the church verified that a church could be built according to local zoning codes.
Last November, I wrote about the case of Rocky Mountain Christian Church (RMCC) in Boulder Colorado, and also did a one-hour show on OK-SAFE’s American in the Balance Internet radio explaining how important this case was to the freedom of churches all across America, and how critical it was that the Supreme Court not hear this case.
The good news is that the Supreme Court has declined to hear the case.
The reason that I did not want RMCC’s case heard is simple. Since the addition of two liberal judges, I felt that there was a more than likely chance that the RLUIPA (Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act) would be declared unconstitutional, leaving hundreds of churches unprotected from being unfairly treated with onerous zoning codes.
There is one thing that I can think of that churches are really lousy at doing and that’s bragging. Remember that old saying, “it ain’t braggin’ if it’s the truth?”
In last week’s article, I wrote about the growing trend to demonize churches as being a burden on society. It doesn’t take much of a Google search to turn up complaints against churches and more than a strong suggestion that churches aren’t paying their fair share of their burden on society because they don’t pay property or income taxes. And that is leading to some real discrimination against churches.
If it weren’t bad enough that many cities in America are plowing ahead with new zoning codes that promote - or even enforce - high density development that are very unfriendly to churches, now churches are being attacked because they are tax-exempt.
Cities have been in financial trouble for several years due to the current recession. When the Great Depression hit in the 1930s, Congress created laws that allowed municipalities to declare bankruptcy, which eventually evolved into the current Chapter 9 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Since the time that the laws were first enacted, about 500 municipalities have declared bankruptcy.
At the close of 2010, I am in my tenth year of writing for the Tulsa Beacon, and I hope that Charley Biggs, who is a good friend and a great editor, will continue printing it for many years to come.
Most of my readers know very little about me because, to be frank, I intend it to be that way. I don’t share much about my family because we want our privacy. But I thought I might at least share a few things with my readers, and perhaps that may help them understand why I continue to write for the Beacon.
“In the beginning the Word already existed. He was with God, and he was God. He was in the beginning with God. He created everything there is. Nothing exists that he didn’t make.” (John 1:1-3 NLT)
The Word is who the apostle Paul spoke about in Romans 1:20 (NLT) when he said:
Could Paul have possibly understood how utterly profound his statement was, when the sky contains an estimated 100 billion galaxies, each with billions of stars? Or that our bodies are composed of highly complex DNA, genes and chromosomes, the blueprint of our humanness? Or that scientists consistently discover more and more things in the universe that exhibit a perfect mathematical precision?
Observing the lives of commoners and of nobility is not all that unlike watching the lives of the average citizen and certain people in government. In medieval England, commoners were people who had little opportunity to make a good life for themselves, and if they did, nobility could steal or destroy their wealth or even kill them with impunity, simply to protect their own interests. The law, what little there was of it in those days, was always on the side of nobility, and as such, commoners had little incentive to make anything of themselves.
According to the Wikipedia, peak oil is defined as “the point in time when the maximum rate of global petroleum extraction is reached, after which the rate of production enters terminal decline.” Peak oil does not mean depletion of oil, but the time at which the amount of oil extraction begins to fall, which theoretically leads to depletion. Since the world population is growing, and with it, the demand for more and more oil, peak oil is seen as a threat to civilization itself.Some experts say that global peak oil will begin around the year 2020, but the International Energy Agency says that it began in 2006. The problem with the theory is that we keep finding more gas and oil, and the reserves that we thought were not recoverable are becoming so with new and better methods for extraction. A very recent Reuters article claimed that oil and gas reserves have increased at record rates over the past year. The proven reserves of gas increased 11 percent, bringing the total gas reserves in the United State to 284 trillion cubic feet. Oil reserves rose 9 percent to 22.3 billion barrels. Reserves in Texas and North Dakota alone rose by 529 million barrels and 481 million barrels, respectively.
The urban planners of our day are busy planning the communities of tomorrow but few of them realize just how fruitless their visions may turn out to be. They believe that demographics predict a society of so-called TINK families (two incomes, no kids) of young professionals that demand more walkable communities and downtown housing. In one respect, they may be right. Though I disagree that children are somehow going to become obsolete, there are statistics that support the belief that if America’s population isn’t shrinking, its rate of growth is at least slowing down. What urban planners have not even considered, however, is the kind of population growth that is occurring, and what the demographics may actually be in twenty to thirty years. It is astounding that they have yet to realize how the existing cultural evolution to Islam will dramatically change their demographic models.
The next time you fly into Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport, you may see two small cemeteries on airport property - at least for now. The cemeteries, St. Johannes, established in 1837, and Rest Haven, established in 1840, are the resting place for over 1,600 parishioners, many of whom were Civil War veterans. St. John’s United Church of Christ built their original structure on the same grounds in 1849, then in 1873 constructed a much larger building. By 1949, Chicago had purchased much of the land around it for the construction of O’Hare International. Unfortunately, St. John’s building and cemetery were in the way and Chicago wanted their land. The City of Chicago had decided to demolish the church building, but the church decided instead to move the building two miles away. However, it was not possible, nor even necessary at that time, to move the cemeteries, so the City of Chicago agreed that the land where the cemeteries were located would not be included in the airport’s future expansions. On that basis, the church continued burials in the two cemeteries for another half century. But by 2001, O’Hare again wanted to enlarge and relocate its runways, and Chicago made it clear that they were going to take the land where the two cemeteries were located along with a portion of the suburb of Bensenville that included about 500 homes.
Authority in zoning matters comes from the state’s police powers, while the authority to exercise eminent domain comes from the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. The only time that RLUIPA can be an effective law in eminent domain cases is when eminent domain is made a part of a particular zoning law. An example of this situation can be found in the Cottonwood Christian Center v. Cypress Redevelopment Agency, in which the church won their case. RLUIPA has also not been effective in situations where zoning codes affect market conditions by reducing the amount of available land caused by the implementation urban growth boundaries. This was demonstrated in the C.L.U.B v. City of Chicago case, where a large group of churches lost their case because the judge said that the market conditions that were causing them problems affected everyone else as well, and therefore there was no discrimination by the city against churches. Before discrimination against churches and others in zoning matters began to be a significant problem, churches could rely upon the Free Exercise Clause in the First Amendment and upon the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses in the Fourteenth Amendment.
No one should interpret this election, or any other election for that matter, as a signal that we can ever assume that our religious rights are safe. Last week I wrote about the case of Rocky Mountain Christian Church, which could expose the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLIUPA) to the scrutiny of the U.S. Supreme Court.
In a case I wrote about in March, Rocky Mountain Christian Church in Boulder County, Colorado, has since won most of its legal battles, but the war is still ongoing. RMCC is a megachurch that had small beginnings in the 80’s, and has since grown to over 2,000 members. Located in an agricultural zone, it applied for a permit to expand its facilities in 1997, but a new zoning code required any church of 100 or more to obtain a special review. As a result, as a condition of the building permit, the church had to sign over 14 of its 50-acre tract to Boulder County in the form of a conservation easement.
At age 14, I was a Boy Scout working on my “God and Country” award in the basement kitchen of our three-story church building in southern Illinois. The walls were covered with metal cabinets full of dishes. As we sat at a table studying, the dishes began to clatter. Though we had never experienced an earthquake before, we knew exactly what it was, and immediately ran out of the building. As we exited the church, we could still hear the building rumbling as the earthquake subsided.
I read an interesting article on the New Geography website by Joel Kotkin entitled “Urban Legends: Why Suburbs, Not Dense Cities, Are the Future”. Kotkin is the editor of the website and is also a Distinguished Fellow in Urban Futures at Chapman University. Kotkin says that the current worldview of development is that the suburbs are going to become a thing of the past, that we will rely more on public transit, our cities will become more densely developed, and we will all have less “personal space.” This worldview envisions the emergence of more and larger megacities whose work forces will provide more professional services and produce fewer manufactured goods.
Planetizen is a website that, by its own definition, “is a public-interest information exchange…for the urban planning, design, and development community.” It is actually a very interesting website, especially for people like me who are interested in urban planning. Several weeks ago I wrote an article that drew the ire of a few of its devotees. The brief version of my article was that sprawl should not be demonized, that churches don’t work the way some planners would like them to in densely developed communities and that there are freedom issues involved in planning. They were particularly perturbed because I had criticized the book, Sidewalks in the Kingdom, which was written by a pastor in support of New Urbanism. I found myself in such disagreement with the premises presented in the book that I put it down without reading it all (in fact, I read almost half of the book.)
The GOP’s “Pledge to America” addresses many of the issues that have led to the financial and political crises that is plaguing our country, and it is looking more and more like the Republicans are going to sweep the House and the Senate in the midterm elections. But for all its good points, it is disconcerting that word “property” does not appear anywhere in its text. Though it does discuss promoting liberty, it does not specifically address the trend toward loss of property rights, without which the Constitution and the Bill of Rights simply do not work. Not only have we taken for granted the right for us to own property and to keep the property that is the fruit of our labors, we have no practical knowledge of what life is like when property, especially land, cannot be owned in perpetuity.
There is no doubt that the most gratifying moments in an architect’s career are when a building is finally finished, but the best of those moments is when the building is a church. Recently I participated in an evening service at Immanuel Baptist Church in Skiatook, where we have just completed the construction of a new 40,000 square foot, 750-seat sanctuary building. Meeting in the old sanctuary, Pastor Jim Standridge spoke to the congregation about how nearly thirty years ago, they had moved from an even older and smaller sanctuary to the one where they were now seated, and had never dreamed that they would ever need anything larger.
After a long day at work I’m driving home, and my last few miles are on a stretch of highway that is all a no-passing zone. In the distance ahead of me, I see her. I dread seeing her, as I’m sure many of my neighbors do, not because she’s a bad driver or a menace on the highway, it’s just that she’s so darned discourteous. Her car is not unlike others, but everyone recognizes her, because she refuses to drive any faster than fifteen miles under the speed limit. I’ve never met the lady, and I know we are not supposed to judge people, but it’s difficult not to imagine that she must have a controlling personality, especially with a bumper sticker that says, “IT’S ALL ABOUT ME.”
Back in the late 1980’s, car manufacturers began doing a peculiar thing with their motors. Instead of aligning the shaft of the motor with the transmission, they turned them ninety degrees. That’s when customers began to complain about service costs of their engines. No longer could the average person change their own spark plugs, because they were so inaccessible that it required a lift to reach them from the bottom, or in some cases the motor had to be removed from the car. The reason for the change? It was cheaper for the manufacturer to install the engine on the assembly line.
The elections on November 2, less than two months from now, will likely decide the fate of the United States for the foreseeable future. And for what is at stake, the outcome of the elections couldn’t be more consequential. It would be as foolish to minimize the results as it was when during the presidential campaign John McCain said, “My friends, you don’t have to fear an Obama presidency.”
Mark Twain once said that man was the only creature on earth with true religion - several of them. America has always been proud of its freedom of religion, and has always been diligent to protect it, regardless of how strange someone’s religion seemed. Therefore, it may seem a ridiculous notion to say that Islam is not a religion. I believe that is it an ideology disguised as a religion and I am one of a growing number who have come to see it that way. Americans are coming to realize that Islam is not like any other religion in the world, because the fact is, it isn’t.
America is just beginning to understand the threat that Islam really is. Nine years after 9/11 occurred, we are just now hearing discussion of Sharia law in the news, and we still have a population and a government that thinks Islam and Western civilizations can coexist with each other. Because of our culture, it is difficult for Westerners to understand that Islam is not just another religion like Buddhism or Hinduism. So it is not surprising that many people, while repulsed at the idea that a giant mosque would be built at the fringe of Ground Zero, would also take the moral high ground and say that they would not be offended if it were built anywhere else. After all, mosques, temples, synagogues and churches are all places of worship, right? This misunderstanding is indeed a problem, and one that stems in part from the interchangeable nature of the word “church” that has become part of our vocabulary. Even though the Bible clearly describes the church to be those who are believers in Jesus Christ, we routinely use the same word to describe the buildings where Christians meet.
A building is a powerful communication tool. If that weren’t true, no one would object to the mosque at Ground Zero.
As such, a church building is a powerful expression of freedom of religion and because most people are familiar with the symbol of the cross, they get the message that Jesus died for us, even if they don’t totally understand why. We are free, at least for now, to place crosses on our churches.
Now that PlaniTulsa has been approved by the City Council, I think it is important to restate my position about how it could affect Tulsa’s churches. As a reminder, nothing has been codified yet. A new zoning code will be written or the existing code will be revised, but in either case, that could take a significant amount of time. (After all, it only took Denver eight years to rewrite their code.) Even so, that should not diminish the urgency to affect its outcome.
The mosque that, despite loud protests from local residents and Americans across the country, is apparently going to be built overlooking Ground Zero in New York is a symptom of an unnamed war in which we are unwittingly engaged. Though our government refuses to acknowledge it as such, it is a war just the same, a war with the ideology of Islam that threatens our freedoms and our way of life.
With little discussion, city councilors approved PlaniTulsa, a New Urbanism design for the city’s Comprehensive Plan for future development. That vote could affect how Tulsans live for decades. Randy Bright, a Tulsa architect and columnist for the Tulsa Beacon, has written extensively about the possible impact of PlaniTulsa’s adoption as the city’s comprehensive plan. It is part of a New Urbanistic-style form-based code. Form-based codes describe how structures will be place and to a degree, how they look according to the “community vision.” Bright wrote, “In other words, the outcome of projects will fit the vision because project owners and their architects will follow a detailed set of rules that leaves little room for creativity. Regardless of what they do, the only buildings that will be approved will be those that meet the criteria that are pre-established in the codes.”
We are all aware by now of the actions of Muslims to build a mosque overlooking the ground zero site of the Twin Towers in New York City. I think all of us, perhaps even some American Muslims, find this to be an insulting, repugnant and insensitive act, but none of us should be surprised by the arrogance shown by Muslim zealots that is part and parcel of the Islamic belief system. Several years ago, I wrote a series of articles about Islam. One of the key points that I asserted then, and still believe now, about Islam is that it is not a religion at all, but is a socio-political system disguised as a religion. Anyone who has made a serious study of the life of Mohammed and Islam can understand how this is true. Unfortunately, it is still being treated as a religion, and as such we afford it the same rights as any other religion in terms of our constitutional rights.
The primary election is July 27 and it is as critical to the future of our nation and our state as the general election will be November 2. Today I bumped into an old acquaintance, a businessman that I have a lot of respect and admiration for. I have known him for almost 15 years, and have on a few occasions over the years asked him what he thought about our presidential candidates. He was always upbeat about who would eventually occupy the office, regardless of which party they came from. In his opinion, it did not matter whether it was a Republican or a Democrat because, being in his seventies, he had seen presidents come and go without harming the country beyond its ability to recover. To him, America had been so resilient that even a bad President couldn’t damage it beyond repair. But today was a different story. In our brief conversation, in which he referred to the Obama Administration as “the regime,” he agreed that the upcoming elections were going to either save our country or break it.
With so much of our attention being focused on the day-to-day activities of life, current events, upcoming elections and family activities, it is easy to forget how important it is to support Israel and its right to exist in peace. The fact that Israel even exists is a miracle, and many believe, myself included, that it is a fulfillment of prophecy that this tiny country, about the size of the eastern third of the state of Oklahoma, has come to exist.
The City of Denver has just released its new zoning code, eight years after it adopted its comprehensive plan, written by Fregonese Associates. The new zoning code, produced by Code Studio in San Antonio, is a whopper, a full 1,024 pages of text and diagrams that breaks down the city into a multitude of zones describing what is allowed and required in each of them. It will take some time to digest such a large document, so it will be a while before I can offer any detailed comments on it. It is, however, important for Tulsans to get to know this code, because John Fregonese told me some time ago that he would recommend that Code Studio write our zoning code after the comprehensive plan was done. I suspect that the City of Tulsa will accept that recommendation, and eventually we will have a new zoning code similar to Denver’s.
One of the activities that the council wants to encourage is “collaboration for sustainable, community gardening and small-scale agriculture.” Where do they suggest this be done? On church property, of course. The council states, “community gardening groups seek opportunities to expand the amount of land in urban / suburban areas under cultivation. Many faith-based institutions have land available to them… Furthermore, religious institutions provide a ready-made market for small-scale, sustainable farmer’s produce” and “local foods decrease carbon emissions associated with transporting food…” This is so transparent it’s almost too embarrassing to warrant a comment. This is an attempt by Obama to gain control over our nation’s churches, as he has said that churches won’t be able to use government funding to proselytize or to discriminate in hiring practices (read last week’s article). Churches need to stay far away from this deal. Churches that provide help to those in need don’t need help from the federal government, and can certainly do it much better without their interference.
We’ve been listening to the “separation of church and state” mantra for decades now, as liberals and progressives have been trying to push God out of anything that is funded with federal tax dollars. But guess what? Obama wants to get your church involved the government handout business, according to recommendations in a 176-page report entitled, “President’s Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships”. In an article entitled, “Obama’s Faith-Based Programs Pushing Global Warming, Climate Change, Green Issues,”, author Warner Todd Huston explains that the intent of the program is to use the faith community to push green initiatives. The article is available on Andrew Breitbart’s “Big Government” website.
Last week my article was about my interview with Senator Randy Brogdon and why I am endorsing him in his race for the governor’s seat. I am impressed with Senator Brogdon because he is a strict constitutionalist, that is to say that he rejects the notion that the Constitution is a living document and embraces the belief that it was written with the timeless concepts that our freedoms come from God and that our property rights must always be respected and protected. The senator is also very interested in leading this state to fiscal responsibility that will bring prosperity to Oklahomans. He has been relentless in his effort to curb state spending and to establish a reasonable budget. I asked him specifically what he would do as governor to make Oklahoma a state that would attract business.
The primaries are approaching quickly and this year I’ve decided give my endorsement in the gubernatorial race to Senator Randy Brogdon. I’ve been watching and listening to Senator Brogdon for a while now, as I am sure many of you have. It is obvious that he is different than the average politician. In fact, I think it would be more accurate to call him a statesman. I’ve gravitated toward Mr. Brogdon because I think he believes what many of us believe, that government, especially the federal government, is too large and has far exceeded its enumerated powers; that states rights are real and should be freely and forcefully exercised by the states; that socialism and Marxism are wrong, and that we should reject it; that taxes are far too high and that state and local governments have assumed far too much power; and that government has (become) fiscally irresponsible.
It was President John Adams who wrote, “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” Last week I wrote about the fact that America was founded as a Christian nation by Christians and cited evidence from a book written by Jerry Newcombe entitled, The Book That Made America - How the Bible Formed Our Nation. But real evidence is no obstacle to groups who are intent not only upon separating the church from the state, but to leading the American people to believe in their version of revisionist history. One only needs to look at the character of those individuals in our governments, from local to federal, to understand how right Adams was. Many of the decisions that are being made on our behalf in the halls of government, and especially in Washington, are being made by men and women who have either lost their moral compass or who no longer fear God, or both. Cap and tax, the health care bill, and our open borders are examples of that. Adams was not just talking about the people who would be governed by the Constitution, but also by who would do the governing. The framers of the Constitution created a document that was a one of a kind, a rare and valuable treasure that is fragile in the hands of those who cannot or will not appreciate its astounding power to empower the individual.
Last week on Fox News, a commentator was interviewing a man from the Freedom From Religion Foundation who said that it was not true that America was founded as a Christian nation. He was either lying or completely ignorant of the facts. But then, most Americans are ignorant of the facts, as was I until a few years ago. Not that I did not already believe that America had been formed by Christians as a Christian nation, because I did; but that I did not see hard facts until recently. I’ve been urging people to read a book written by Jerry Newcombe entitled, The Book That Made America - How the Bible Formed Our Nation to learn the facts about our Founding Fathers. Our schools stopped teaching those facts almost a century ago, and that was the beginning of our country’s drift toward Godlessness, liberalism, progressivism and ultimately now toward Marxism. One of the biggest surprises in the book is the history of an 1892 U.S. Supreme Court case, United States v. the Church of the Holy Trinity, that led to a decision that emphatically held that “This is a Christian Nation.”
The ACLU suffered a severe blow last week from the Supreme Court in a decision that reversed a lower court ruling to remove an eight-foot steel pipe cross from a 1.3 million acre Mojave Desert park in California.
The memorial cross, otherwise known as the Mojave Desert Veterans Memorial, was installed in 1934 by the Veterans of Foreign Wars as a tribute to fallen World War I soldiers.
Justice Kennedy wrote the majority opinion, in which he said, “A Latin cross is not merely an affirmation of Christian beliefs. It is a symbol often used to honor and respect those whose heroic acts, noble contributions, and patient striving help secure an honored place in history for this Nation and its people. Here, a Latin cross in the desert evokes far more than religion. It evokes thousands of small crosses in foreign fields marking the graves of Americans who fell in battles, battles whose tragedies are compounded if the fallen are forgotten.”
Kennedy added, “The goal of avoiding governmental endorsement (of religion) does not require eradication of all religions symbols in the public realm.”
In the last weeks of 1981, I was sitting in an architectural firm in Montgomery (Cincinnati), Ohio, twiddling my thumbs with nothing to do. The recession was in full swing, the prime interest rate was 22 percent, and Jimmy Carter’s Misery Index was off the charts. Architects, engineers, and builders were going out of business at a rapid rate. On December 31, I was handed my final paycheck and not long after that the firm closed its doors. I spent the next six weeks looking for work in Ohio and my home state of Illinois, and got only one offer that was almost half of the already meager salary that I had been earning when I was laid off. While visiting my parents, my mother told me that her next door neighbor had a grandson who was an engineer in Tulsa, and suggested I call him. I really wasn’t thrilled with the idea of moving to Oklahoma, even for a job, but I was desperate. Besides, I needed to get enough time in working for an architect so that I could get a license and start my own business. When I called him he enthusiastically told me, “there are a lot of jobs in Tulsa!” and suggested a few architects to contact.
The Sam Adams Alliance has awarded one of its annual “Sammie” awards to Ed Osborne, an auto repair shop owner in Wilmington, Delaware, who fought a three-year long battle to save his property from being taken by eminent domain and his drive to enact legislation that protects others from becoming victims in the same way that he was.
I once heard one of my colleagues say that we build such “ugliness,” implying that something needed to be done about all the poor souls who were constructing buildings in our community who have no real taste in architecture. But this is the essence of freedom. I may think your building is really ugly, but I would defend you to the death to have the right to build anything as ugly as you like. But I also have the freedom to choose to not buy your building from you because, frankly, I really do think it’s ugly. The point is, we can’t make an entire city like Tulsa to be like The Villages or Celebration, nor should we. We should allow developers to build what they like, according to what the market will bear, and allow creativity to create a diverse architectural community. Given the right attitude toward freedom, even ugly stuff can look pretty good.
Randy Brogdon was elected State Senator in 2002. He was responsible for the “Taxpayer Bill of Rights,” or TABOR, and the “Taxpayer Transparency Act.” He led the movement for the State of Oklahoma to opt out of the Real ID Act of 2005, and he authored Senate Joint Resolution 10, the 10th Amendment Resolution, which was designed to protect states rights. He also achieved a 100 percent score on the Conservative Vote Index. Oklahoma is facing severe challenges over the coming months and years. One is from the onslaught of federal laws, such as the health care bill, that will hurt all of our states. Another challenge will be to convince our own state legislators that they need to be fiscally conservative. Without a strong conservative in the governor’s office, Oklahoma will not be able to prevent an economic disaster. That is just one reason why I am asking my readers to get behind Senator Brogdon, and help him win this election. I’ll be discussing more reasons to elect him in coming articles.
The health care bill has been passed and signed into law, apparently without a constitutional up or down vote. Whether it really happens or not isn’t irrelevant, but the point in fact is that we have allowed the inmates to run the asylum. Had it not happened that weekend, the lunatics in Washington would continue to try to pass it again and again until somehow, some way, it becomes the law of the land. Without real constitutional leadership from the president down to the lowest elected official, things will just get more insane. Not that things aren’t insane enough as it is, and in the world of zoning and land regulation, things don’t get much nuttier than on the east coast. For example, New Jersey has found it necessary to write a law that will protect developers from zoning officials who have been forcing them to conform to new zoning regulations after their projects have already been reviewed, approved and permitted.
If you would like to know what kind of relationship will exist between Tulsa and its churches five or ten years from now, it’s very easy. All you have to do is look at churches in other parts of the country that have already adopted planning strategies that promote high density development.
As I am writing this article on March 21, the freedom of America is being dismantled by the Democrats in Washington who voted to ignore the Constitution in order to install their own brand of socialism. Ironically, I’ve been reading a book entitled, The Book That Made America - How the Bible Formed Our Nation, by Jerry Newcombe, which emphatically and historically describes how this nation was founded by Christians for the purpose of spreading the Gospel. And while I knew that it was founded as a Christian nation, I am just discovering the extent of that truth. My first question is, whose idea was it to conceal this from me and several generations?
Rocky Mountain Christian Church has been struggling since 2004 to get permission from the Boulder County Board to add a gymnasium, chapel, art gallery and education building to its existing facilities. The addition would add 132,000 square feet to its current campus of 116,000 square feet.
But in 1996, Boulder County adopted a new zoning code, the Boulder County Land Use Code that was the eventual result of the adoption of the Boulder County Comprehensive Plan in 1978.
In the Introduction to the Comprehensive Plan it states, “Since its initial adoption in 1978, the overall philosophy of the Plan has changed very little… growth should be channeled to municipalities, agricultural lands should be protected, and preservation of our environmental and natural resources should be a high priority in making land decisions.”
Later in the Plan, it discusses how development will be done around CSA’s, Community Service Areas, which it defines as a “boundary line drawn around a municipality within which a city expects to accommodate future urban growth.” It also says, “land outside CSA’s and their transition areas will remain rural; urban services will not be extended there and zoning will prohibit urban development and densities…”
According to an article last fall by Joel Kotkin in Forbes.com, California is paying its bills with IOUs, its credit rating is shot and instead of it producing the seventh largest GDP in the world as it has in the past, it’s more like Argentina. He wrote, “Burdened by taxes and ever-growing regulation, the state is routinely rated by executives as having among the worst business climates in the nation.” One blogger wrote, “It turns out an increasing number of our fellow Californians are finding it difficult to live here… they’re moving out of California. Who can blame them? California is expensive, it’s crowded, and our policymakers have let us down repeatedly.” With high unemployment, skyrocketing property taxes, disastrous foreclosure rates and a state budget that is in deficit, Californians have been leaving the state by the thousands for years. Even so, the population is increasing - due to immigration. So what does California do? They pass their new mandatory Green Building Standards Code, otherwise known as Calgreen.
What is also apparent is that because a long-standing belief has been totally disproved, it has left many to wonder what about the Green movement is worth saving.
New Urbanism was one of those movements that saw its greatest growth during the years that global warming was accepted as a fact. As a point of fact, one of the key ingredients of New Urbanism is to reduce (or to some of the more radical, eliminate) the use of the car, because the movement said that cars were causing global warming. Of course, even though they will eventually give up global warming (very quietly I think), they will find other justifications for their beliefs.
So my point is, just because the myth of global warming goes away, the Green movement, New Urbanism, LEED, and a whole host of industries that have reinvented themselves won’t. There’s simply too much money and pride invested in it.
What immediately interested me about this case was that there was an assumption from the outset that the county’s social services were more important than those that the church offered. Under this assumption, I question how any church could argue that they were more relevant than government. On the contrary, I think that we who believe in small government could argue by asking the question, why does a local government need to be involved in providing those kind of services to begin with?
If you think churches aren’t in the crosshairs for eminent domain and zoning abuse, I’d like to invite you to go to the website for The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty where you will find a long list of cases involving churches in a struggle to survive. Here are some examples. In C.L.U.B v. City of Chicago, a group of churches filed suit because they believed that the city was imposing a substantial burden on their churches because permits for construction were too costly and too politicized for small churches to bear. “Substantial burden” is a key ingredient of RLIUPA (Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act) necessary to prevent abuse and to uphold the property rights of churches. The government is prohibited from imposing a substantial burden on a church that is more than would be imposed on others. In that case, the churches lost when the courts decided to ignore RLIUPA.
There is a scripture in Hosea 4:6 (NIV) that says, “My people are destroyed from lack of knowledge.” In the New Living Translation Bible, it says, “My people are being destroyed because they don’t know me.” God, through his prophet Hosea, was accusing his priests of misleading His people into an idolatrous life that excluded God. We are witnessing a parallel to this scripture as we watch our nation’s leaders take this country further away from God and further away from the Constitution that He clearly gave to us. The author of The 5000-Year Leap writes, “No principle was emphasized more vigorously during the Constitutional Convention than the necessity of limiting the authority of the federal government. Not only was this to be done by carefully defining the powers delegated to the government, but the Founders were determined to bind down its administrators with legal chains codified in the Constitution.”
I have been reading the final draft of “Our Vision for Tulsa,” the outcome document of the comprehensive plan, and I still have the same concerns I had in the past that include, among others, how our churches will be treated as we fall under the heavy regulation that will come with zoning changes. Consider this statement, found on page 38 of the document: “Tulsa’s land-use program and enforcement regulations must be driven by the goals they are meant to achieve. Owners, for example, must be able to determine easily and efficiently how property can be developed. Variances should granted rarely if allowed uses are clear and support a community vision.” Isn’t this a bit like Henry Ford, who cheerfully said that you could have your Model T in any color you like as long as it’s black? Even a genius like Henry Ford quickly discovered how foolish that philosophy was. And yet this document’s statement cheerfully, and with optimistic enthusiasm, says that if you do it our way, it will be easy. If not, we won’t let you do it at all.
I have just read a most insightful paper regarding New Urbanism entitled, “Village Vices: The Contradiction of New Urbanism and Sustainability.” It was written by Ruth Durack, who is now the director for the Urban Design Centre in Western Australia. At the time she wrote the paper in 1998, she lived in the United States and it won second place in the 1998 Chicago Institute for Architecture and Urbanism Award. It was later published in Places Journal, which is produced by the UC Berkeley College of Environmental Design. The driving force behind New Urbanism is to achieve sustainability by returning people to cities designed to a standard that essentially exemplifies a traditional English village. The classic definition of sustainability assumes that the resources of the earth are finite, and that the present generation must conserve resources for future generations. But Durack successfully challenged the notion that we must all fit into a New Urbanistic mold to accomplish what needs to be accomplished in order to achieve sustainability.
She also said, “the United States needs to get the regulations in place and the public opinion in place to make it more attractive for private industry to fund projects.” She believes that if we were to focus on high-speed rail that many international investors would come to America, but that the $8 billion allotted in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is insufficient to do the task. She believes that the amount needed is about $600 billion. Overall, it’s not great news on the economic front, and I can’t see how it can improve much as long as we have the Congress and the president that we have now. Because of the health care and the cap-and-trade issues, business owners in America (and to a great extent, the rest of the world) can’t make decisions (especially regarding hiring) when they don’t know what the rules are going to be. We all know that costs are going to skyrocket if they succeed in passing the health care bill, and if any version of cap-and-trade is passed, it will certainly destroy our economy. Who wants to make an investment with those kinds of odds?
Another architect, who expressed his concern for energy efficient design and sustainability, felt that the global warming movement was being taken advantage of by the architectural community in order to make more money, and that it had lost interest in real science.
“From the time the world was created, people have seen the earth and sky and all that God made. They can clearly see his invisible qualities - his eternal power and divine nature. So they have no excuse whatsoever for not knowing God.”
The next one wrote to let me know that my article was being noticed by the architectural community, and thanked me for writing it. Another wrote to offer his support to me and to others who had not jumped on the global warming bandwagon. He felt that the basis of global warming was spiritual, not scientific, and was a liberal philosophy intended to reduce mankind’s position to something less than God had intended. Another e-mailer, a newly licensed architect, wrote to compliment me on the article and said that he had confronted a number of myths in our profession, but that the one that troubled him the most was that the sustainability movement was the solution to all of the problems of the world.
My concerns regarding sustainability, New Urbanism, the “Green” movement, and form-based codes were raised when I realized that their impact could be very detrimental to our churches. My concerns were confirmed when I learned that Ft. Collins, Colorado, had adopted a form-based code in 1997 that included an urban growth boundary that forced dense development by prohibiting construction around the perimeter of the city. A city planner there said to me, that while churches were allowed in nearly all zones, “good luck finding land.” These kinds of codes create land shortages and very high land prices.
Before that, I thought there were few like myself that had not bought into the global warming hoax. And a hoax is exactly what it is. Last week someone hacked into the Climactic Research Unit’s (CRU) files and found documents that indicate that data has been intentionally manipulated to “prove” global warming to have been man-made. This is significant because the CRU is a primary source for the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which has had much to do with the formation of global warming policies world-wide. The CRU is responsible for developing the so-called “hockey-stick” graph that plots a history of stable average world temperatures until the early 1900s, when it begins to skyrocket at about the time of the invention of the car.
New Ruralism does not necessarily have anything to do with rural towns, rural areas or small towns, as its name could imply. Instead it looks at the edge of cities as areas that can be used for the production of food for that city in particular, and that edge area can be significant in size.
She writes, “The geography for New Ruralism can be generally defined as rural lands within urban influence; the larger the metropolis, the larger the field of influence. The geographical structure of metropolitan regions extends out from the urban-rural interface and the rural-urban fringe to exurbia and beyond, to urban-influenced farmland.”
Frankly, I find it fascinating that “progressive” and secular people, who believe in sustainability and environmentalism, who likely recycle their trash, drive hybrids and complain about global warming caused by manufacturing, see no problem with destroying an entire site, including functional buildings, then construct more streets and buildings, all in order to create the kind of urban streetscape that they feel is appropriate. I have no problem with a church becoming a developer in order to preserve its place, and as a matter of fact I have written articles in the past suggesting that it could be a viable solution for some churches. However, when the real purpose of a project like this is to convert existing church property into a compact neighborhood, then the church’s survival in the plan is incidental, not purposeful. In that case, the church’s actual survival in the plan is not likely.
Architect Newswire, an online architectural newsletter, has published an article entitled, “Maryland’s Smart Growth Policy is a Flop.” The article was by a Washington Post staff writer who had written about a study conducted by The University of Maryland. That study gauged the effectiveness of smart-growth policies enacted ten years ago by the State of Maryland. The staff writer wrote, “An innovative policy to fight suburban sprawl catapulted Maryland into the national spotlight a decade ago and became then-Gov. Parris N. Glendening’s principal legacy. But a new study says the law has been a bust, largely because it has no teeth to force local governments to comply and because builders have little incentive to redevelop older urban neighborhoods.”
Tulsa has always been relatively friendly to businesses that wanted to move here or to expand their facilities here. I use the word “relatively” because there are enough regulations here to frustrate some, but Tulsa is, in fact, an easier place to deal with in comparison with other cities. (If you still think that Tulsa is hard to deal with, read the book, The Last Harvest, which is about a developer that was forced through years of needless regulatory reviews before he was allowed to build what should have been a simple housing subdivision.) At least since I have moved here in 1982, Tulsa has always had affordable housing, as has most cities throughout the Midwest, with some exceptions such as Chicago, Denver, and Ft. Collins. The difference is that those cities imposed growth management regulations while others like Tulsa did not.
Randal O’Toole addresses this issue in a Policy Analysis paper entitled “How Urban Planners Caused the Housing Bubble”, released on October 1 of this year by the Cato Institute. It is his contention that the root cause of the problem was not the Community Reinvestment Act, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (although all of those played a role). He makes a strong case that it was growth management policies leading to land shortages that have triggered all of the housing bubbles that have occurred since the early 1970s, when Los Angeles, San Diego, San Jose and San Francisco were among the first in the nation to impose urban-growth boundaries in an effort to curb and control growth. Much of the data that O’Toole presents shows a strong correlation between areas where growth management policies had been enacted and how severely the housing bubble affected those areas.
I know some folks downtown are getting nervous about the attention I have been giving to what is going on with our comprehensive planning effort. My interest in city planning was sparked by the realization several years ago that the current trends in planning was creating critical shortages of land that would preclude churches from building the kind of facilities that they need. I realized this when I spoke to a zoning official at Ft. Collins, Colorado, who told me that even though their code allowed churches in nearly all zones of the city, “good luck finding land.” It was at that time that I began to research form-based codes and New Urbanism, and I began to discover that there are two sides to those issues, and as I began to write about that, others around the country began to discover me. Most found it incredulous that the new codes would ever be harmful to our churches, and for every one who challenged me on the facts, I challenged them to produce for me one real example of how the new codes benefited a church. Not one of them ever did. I was challenged by the editor of a popular form-based code, and actually had a very long e-mail discourse discussing the topic of how the codes would affect churches. I was told, “We are opposed to the mega-church isolated in the countryside or suburbs surrounded by acres of parking.
I want make something perfectly clear about form-based codes (FBCs), especially the kind that Tulsa looks likely to adopt; there is nothing wrong with them, as long as compliance with the codes is voluntary. The more I study and read about FBCs and New Urbanism, the more I am convinced that there are serious constitutional issues that are being overlooked in this nationwide drive by cities to convert their zoning and city planning to an outcome-based system of codes. Among those leading the charge are those who believe that a form-based code should be enforced so as to achieve a “vision,” or as one author calls it, a “desired urban form.” Their attitude is, what the public sees, the public owns.
The problem is, that’s what people think New Urbanism is, when in reality it is only a very small part of a New Urbanistic-style form-based code. Why are they called form-based codes? Because the codes prescribe how structures will be placed, and, to a degree, how they will look, according to the community “vision.” The idea is that if you create enough regulations, you can create the “form” of community that fits that vision by default. In other words, the outcome of projects will fit the vision because project owners and their architects will follow a detailed set of rules that leaves little room for creativity. Regardless of what they do, the only buildings that will be approved will be those that meet the criteria that are pre-established in the codes. Where does that vision come from? Typically a “visioning” process is conducted, whereby facilitators hold workshops to collect the ideas of the community. Regardless of how the facilitators conduct the process, the end result is going to be a plan that fits New Urbanistic principles, but that is “calibrated” to the community.
PlaniTulsa recently released its 45-page draft report entitled Our Vision for Tulsa, which outlines the next steps in our comprehensive planning process. It is available online at the PlaniTulsa website. You won’t find the phrase “New Urbanism” anywhere in this document, but that is, in fact, what is described. All of the components of New Urbanism are in this report - mixed-use developments, choices of driving, biking, walking or light rail, “innovative parking solutions,” housing choices, “planning for complete communities,” public-private partnerships, “smart use of land,” transit oriented developments (TOD’s), shared parking lots and facilities, infill development, open space, compact communities and numerous references to sustainability.
On August 6, the Miami City Commission voted to kill Miami 21, what would have been their new Comprehensive Plan, when two commissioners voted no to its final approval. The single vote that killed the initiative was delivered by Commission Chairman Joe Sanchez, who decided at the last minute that the zoning overhaul that would take place as a result of the new Comprehensive Plan placed the City of Miami at too great a risk over issues of property rights. Sanchez released a press statement that explained his no vote on Miami 21: “It was painful to vote against a concept I believe in. “For more than a decade, I have supported smart growth principles such as pedestrian-friendly development, public transit, bicycle lanes, neighborhood preservation, shade trees, parkland, green space and sustainability. “Tragically, the version of Miami 21 that came up for a vote yesterday was tainted by restrictions that placed our residents in harm’s way by exposing us to tens of millions of dollars in lawsuits from loss of property value.
Want to learn what development is like under high-density development rules? The best way is to look at cases in areas that are already under dense growth rules. One such case is that of Christ Evangelical Lutheran Church of Bethesda-Chevy Chase in Maryland. The church has been working for years to get zoning approvals needed to renovate their existing sanctuary building and to add other buildings to their site.
As the City of Tulsa approaches the point that it will re-write or revise its zoning ordinances, it would be good for city staff and residents to consider not only what the impact of high-density development can be, but the position it places churches when they want to maintain a presence in a city that gives them no room to grow.
“Bethel World Outreach Ministries, a Global Mission Church megachurch of 2,000 located in Silver Springs, Maryland, lost its case last March in a state appellate court in its attempt to force Montgomery County to amend its water and sewer plan to allow them to develop its property.”….. “While this particular case is far too complicated to judge from cursory reports, it does seem to provide anecdotal evidence that city planners should think ahead in how such cases would be handled in their city. I hope that the planners for the City of Tulsa will consider cases like this, and look for ways to avoid similar situations from developing here.”
The real answer to getting the economy back on track is for the Obama administration and the Democrats to stop what they are doing. American businesses don’t know what to expect from Cap and Trade, or socialization of health care, and see out of control spending as inflationary and detrimental to the economy. That naturally makes even the most die-hard, risk-taking capitalist nervous about implementing new projects or hiring additional people. Stopping the stimulus spending, dropping Cap and Trade and abandoning the socialization of health care would give businesses confidence in the future, and that would immediately boost the economy. Oklahoma may be doing great in comparison with other states, but if things continue as they are, it will eventually catch up with us. Then there will be lots of Oklahomans sitting around the table saying, “Lord, give us just one more boom and we promise not to fritter it away.”
Recently I received an e-mail from the author of a book about form-based codes that kindly disagreed with an article I wrote last month in which I said (again) that the new zoning codes won’t adequately protect our churches.
His e-mail was lengthy, but to be brief, here were the three points that he made. First, separation of church and state has led to laws that protect churches from limitation by regulation. Second, form-based codes don’t regulate churches. Third, form based codes are about giving people choices in regards to location, etc..
It’s around 1050 B.C., and the Israelites are all looking at Samuel and saying, “Hey, Sam, it’s been a great gig, but you’re getting kind of old, and those two sons of yours are nothing but a couple of bums. It’s time for us to have our own king. All the other Ites have a king, why not us?”
Well, Samuel was quite upset with his people, because they had never had a king. They had always relied on God. But as was his custom, before he would do anything, he decided to talk it over with God.
The American Clean Energy Security Act of 2009 (H.R. 2454), otherwise known as the Waxman-Markey bill or the “cap and trade” bill, is a tax bill that, if passed, will be devastating to our economy.
The stated purpose of this bill (which was 1,500 pages long and was rushed through the House without anyone reading it) is to reduce CO2 levels in the atmosphere and to reduce the effects of global warming. This would be done over a 40-year period, starting with a 3 percent reduction below 2005 levels of CO2 by the year 2012, then 17 percent by 2020, 42 percent by 2030, and 83 percent by the year 2050.
The results for the Scenario Preference Vote for PlaniTulsa was finally announced last week, five weeks after the final date of voting. You can read the results in a document entitled Which Way Tulsa Survey Results that is available at the PlaniTulsa website.
Were there any surprises? Not really. The interpretation of the votes, in addition to the information from the Detailed Mapping Workshops and the phone interviews that were done earlier, was that Tulsans wanted development to be focused on downtown and to bring light rail to Tulsa.
Last week, I wrote about how I thought the new Tulsa zoning code should be written in regard to limitations it would place on churches. If you read that article, you might have come away with the impression that I thought that churches should be able to build what they want and where they want without any rules. But that is not the case at all.
Since Tulsa will be re-writing its zoning code soon after the Comprehensive Plan is completed, churches in Tulsa need to get involved in the process and insist that churches will not be discriminated against, even if it is inadvertent. Once written, it could become quite difficult to change.
Churches in outlying communities should also be very interested in how Tulsa’s zoning codes are written, since it is likely that they will eventually follow suit with similar codes.
The people who write this code will probably be from a consulting firm that is not from Tulsa, and the first thing that they should recognize is that churches are not like a Starbucks or McDonalds. You can go to any of these and get exactly the same espresso or quarter-pounder regardless of where they are located, but it is not the same with churches.
While God is the same God everywhere too, it is not so with individual churches. Churches have their own individual character and personality because of the people that make up the church and because of varying denominational beliefs. So when people select a church, they select the one that fits them best. It is a bit like getting married; people don’t want to join a church with the idea that it won’t be a permanent relationship.
The jury is still out on the future of Tulsa’s churches in its new comprehensive plan. Voting for one of the four proposed PlanitTulsa scenarios was completed June 18, but there are still no results posted at the website.
Jack Crowley announced his plans for downtown Tulsa on June 30, which apparently will include light rail. If it is anything like his preliminary plans that were released some time ago, it will include a spider-like network of light rail lines from downtown Tulsa to a number of outlying communities.
It seems inappropriate to be announcing specific plans before the votes on the four scenarios have even been announced, but I don’t think it is inappropriate to begin asking how the new comprehensive plan or the new zoning code will treat churches.
There is a very small but power-packed book entitled, The Law - The Classic Blueprint for a Free Society, that was written in 1849 by Frederic Bastiat, a Frenchman who saw that America’s form of government was the most free in the world.
The next step in the process of Tulsa’s transformation after the completion of the Comprehensive Plan will be to re-write our zoning codes. While our present zoning code may have some flaws, by and large it has accomplished two of its most important goals - the first being that it has protected property rights by creating predictability in the use of land and second, being that it allowed for orderly growth. Tulsa’s goal has always been to attract people from other cities and states to what we locals have always seen in Tulsa: a friendly, pro-family community with a low cost of living and a high quality of life.
We know that many people are leaving the West and East coasts to escape the high cost of living, unaffordable housing, overbearing regulations, crime, high taxes, property rights violations and congestion, so doesn’t it make sense that if we want the growth, we should create a community that offers a sanctuary from these things? So here are a few common sense suggestions for how we could accomplish that. First, it should be made clear in policy and statute that Tulsa will not invoke eminent domain for any other reason than the founders created it for - roads, highways, or similar public works. I would want to know that if I were to buy a property here that it would not be taken from me.
Last week, I wrote about one of my old college textbooks, The Use of Land - A Citizens’ Policy Guide to Urban Growth - A Task Force Report Sponsored by the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, that was written back in 1973. It is apparent that many of the troubling regulations we have now, and will see in the near future, may have come about because of those who wrote it. I would have thought that there would have been more regard for property rights three decades ago, but the writers of this book had no reservations in proposing laws and regulations that would severely limit the use of land.
It did not take long for the writers to suggest the heavy hand of government to force the preservation of open spaces in urban areas. They wrote that one way to protect open areas was for “owners of open spaces to give up or sell part of their property rights… In time, we believe, ownership of open spaces without urbanization rights should become as commonplace as ownership of land without mineral rights… A changed attitude toward land - a separation of ownership of the land itself from ownership of urbanization rights - is essential.”
The writers eluded to the eminent domain issue, eerily prophetic of Kelo vs. New London, when they wrote, “The interpretation of the “takings clause” (which has sometimes been construed to prohibit governmental restrictions on the use of privately owned land)…is therefore a crucial matter for future land-use planning and regulatory programs…It is time that the U.S. Supreme Court re-examine its precedents that seem to require a balancing of public benefit against land value loss in every case and declare that, when the protection of natural, cultural, or aesthetic resources or the assurance of orderly development are involved, a mere loss in land value is no justification for invalidating the regulation of land use.”
...Besides Dallas, there are 12 suburban cities that are members, all of which have been members since 1983.
No other cities have joined since then, even though there are 26 others that are eligible to join. Those have declined for several reasons; some have rejected membership by the voters, some are unable to join because an additional sales tax would cause them to exceed the maximum allowed by state law, and others have joined other transit systems.
Assuming my friend’s estimate of 80,000 riders per day is correct, and assuming that the total is a conservative 2 million, where does that place the percentage of the population that uses light rail? Around 4 percent....
In a recent online periodical, AIArchitect This Week, the headline was, “AIA Supports Transportation for America’s Blueprint for National Transportation Program Authorization”. This was in reference to a 100-page paper entitled “Route to Reform - Blueprint for a 21st Century Transportation Program” issued by Transportation for America (or T4 America).... I recently spoke at a group in Oklahoma City, the Oklahoma Conservative Political Action Committee, speaking about New Urbanism and light rail. After the meeting I was approached by a gentleman who rather forcefully told me that I was all wrong about light rail. I told him the same thing that I tell most people who think I am wrong about something - show me the facts, and if I’m wrong, I will be more than happy to write an article saying so.
He claimed that building light rail was actually cheaper than building roads because the rails and trains last longer than roads do. He claimed that DART (Dallas Area Rapid Transit) had been a great success, and that they were expanding the lines because it was so popular.
When I pressed him for proof, he could not cite any, but he did arouse my curiosity about DART, so I’ve done some research for him. In fact, DART was mentioned in AIArchitect This Week as an example of a successful light rail system.... Sounds good? Before you decide, you need to hear the other side of the story, next week.
The push is on for rail transit in Tulsa as well as the rest of the country.
In September, the 2009 Transportation Bill (SAFETEA-LU, otherwise know as the federal surface transportation policy) will allocate billions of dollars to projects across the country, and proponents of rail are lobbying Congress to fund “sustainable” forms of transportation. This bill comes up for renewal every six years, so the stakes are high.
In Tulsa, planners have formulated four separate scenarios for our new Comprehensive Plan. These are available to see online at the PlaniTulsa website......
I agree that Tulsa needs to do something to improve itself, but we need to look toward innovation instead of subsidization. The push for rail is really about reducing the use of the car and creating dense development, not providing for the poor, not providing transportation options. Tulsa has an opportunity to be a planning leader by being fiscally responsible and finding a better way to develop the city, without pouring scarce money down a black hole.
I occasionally get e-mails from people who don’t like what I write. Today I got one from someone who I think may be local, but alas, he was unwilling to say. I am willing to talk or correspond with anyone who wants to have an open and honest debate, but this guy accused me of being dishonest and an ideologue because, in his opinion, I was unwilling to look at both sides of the issue.
The truth is, I have. I cannot impart to you the amount of reading and study I have done on this issue of New Urbanism, zoning, and planning. I’ve even gone back to my old college textbooks to see what people thought about the subject thirty years ago.
The problem is, no one else is giving the other side of the story. There is more to this issue than developing cute streetscapes. That part is just the movie set, the facade. And the kind of planning that is being implemented around the country cannot be validated just because everyone else is doing it. After all, one of the things that New Urbanists are vehement about is sprawl – but didn’t we do that because everyone thought it was the right thing to do for the last fifty years? Perhaps fifty years from our ancestors will be saying what a stupid thing New Urbanism was, what were they thinking back then? ……So again, I am more than happy to have a debate with anyone, but don’t expect me to make the case for the other side. There are plenty of people who are more than willing to do that, and many who are more reasonable and informed than this fellow was. And if I may be so bold as to imitate Rush Limbaugh, I don’t have to give equal time to the other side - I am equal time.
Since it looks like the new Tulsa Comprehensive Plan will include light rail mass transit, I thought it would be interesting to present the highlights of a report by author Randal O’Toole entitled, “Rail Disasters 2005,” to describe the outcome that we can expect. This is especially important in view of the budget cuts that Mayor Taylor recently submitted to the City Council. If Tulsa is having trouble keeping the lights on, so to speak, why would we consider an expensive system like light rail.
“You are going to be hearing and seeing more in the coming months and years about light rail in Tulsa, since there are those who see it as a necessary component of the new comprehensive plan that will follow a New Urbanism model. John Fregonese, our planning consultant is an advocate of light rail, and he will undoubtedly vision it in Tulsa’s future….
Light rail is extremely expensive to build. It costs about the same to build one mile of light rail as it does to build one mile of a four lane highway, and according to Randal O’Toole’s “Great Rail Disasters” report, “highways produce nearly 100 times as much passenger transport plus far more freight transport than transit”.”
The Brookings Institute has released a report entitled Job Sprawl Revisited: The Changing Geography of Metropolitan Employment that indicates the push towards densifying the populations of cities is not achieving the success that proponents hoped to see.
According to the report, “Only 21 percent of employees in the top 98 metro areas work within three miles of downtown, while over twice that share (45 percent) work more than ten miles away from the city center. The larger the metro area, the more likely people are to work more than ten miles from downtown; almost 50 percent of jobs in larger metros like Detroit, Chicago and Dallas locate more than ten miles away on average compared to just 27 percent of jobs in smaller metros like Lexington-Fayette, Boise, and Syracuse.”
It’s been a couple of years now since I began writing articles in response to the City of Tulsa’s effort to revise its Comprehensive Plan, beginning with the seminar that the city presented where words like “sustainability” and “mixed use development” were gently introduced to a crowd of architects, engineers and realtors.
I was already very aware of and self-educated on New Urbanism at the time, and when I asked one of the city staff people if that is where the city was headed, I was told, “maybe we are, maybe we aren’t”.
After watching PlaniTulsa, I don’t think that there is any doubt that that is exactly where this city is headed. In my opinion, the decision to lead Tulsa in that direction had already been made far in advance of that seminar or the hiring of the comprehensive planning consultant.
This is truly a life-changing event to see, and is a must-see if you are in Florida during the play season. You can see some clips of the play at www.storyofjesus.com, but they don’t do the real thing justice. It must be seen to be appreciated.
America has been gradually moving away from its constitution and toward a form of socialism for many years, and while most of us realize that things are not as free as they used to be, we may not realize just how closely our policies come to meeting the definition of Marxism. Of course, few would admit that we are Marxist because we can still vote, we still have (somewhat) free enterprise, and we can still travel without a soldier asking us for our “papers” at a check point. And we certainly don’t think of ourselves as the Communist that Karl Marx (1818-1883) was.
But before you think I’ve lost my senses, listen to what Karl Marx and his close friend Friedrich Engels believed government policies should be.
|